JOINT OPERATIONS AND COUNTER-BANDITRY OUTCOMES IN KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA: ASSESSING MILITARY AND LOCAL SECURITY COOPERATION
Keywords:
Banditry, Joint Operations, Military Cooperation, Local Security Operatives, Counter-Banditry, Kaduna State, Intelligence sharing, NigeriaAbstract
The persistence of banditry in North-western Nigeria has emerged as one of the most significant security challenges confronting the Nigerian state. Kaduna State has remained a major hotspot due to recurring incidents of armed attacks, kidnapping for ransom, cattle rustling, destruction of property, and displacement of communities. In response, the Nigerian military has increasingly collaborated with local security actors, including vigilante groups, hunters, community policing structures, traditional institutions, and local intelligence networks, to combat banditry. This study assesses the effectiveness of military and local security cooperation in counter-banditry operations in Kaduna State between 2019 and 2025. The paper adopts a qualitative approach based on documentary analysis of academic literature, government reports, security publications, and media sources. Guided by Security Governance Theory, the study examines the mechanisms of cooperation, operational outcomes, challenges, prospects of joint operations policy reports, security briefings, scholarly publications, and operational records. Findings reveal that military-local security cooperation has improved intelligence gathering, enhanced rapid response capabilities, facilitated community trust-building, and contributed to the disruption of bandit networks in several local government areas. However, operational effectiveness remains constrained by inadequate logistics, poor coordination, mutual distrust, limited training of local security actors, intelligence leakages, and weak institutional frameworks. The study concludes that while joint operations have yielded measurable gains in reducing bandit activities in some areas, sustainable security requires institutionalized collaboration, enhanced capacity-building, community engagement, and improved governance. The paper recommends strengthening civil-military relations, formalizing local security participation, improving intelligence-sharing mechanisms, and addressing the socio-economic drivers of banditry.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.